Back
U.S.-based DeFi group urges UK FCA to anchor crypto rules to 'unilateral control'
News

U.S.-based DeFi group urges UK FCA to anchor crypto rules to 'unilateral control'

DeFi Education Fund says developers of non-custodial protocols should not be regulated as intermediaries under the U.K.'s proposed crypto regime.

2/13/20265 min read12 views

Context of crypto regulation in the UK

The UK government has been actively working on creating a comprehensive regulatory framework for the cryptocurrency market in recent years. The main goal is to ensure investor safety and prevent the use of crypto assets for illicit purposes, such as money laundering and tax evasion.

The FCA (Financial Conduct Authority of the UK) proposals envisage the regulation of cryptocurrency companies as financial intermediaries, which raises concerns among decentralized finance (DeFi) representatives.

Position of the DeFi Education Fund

The DeFi Education Fund, based in the USA, has called on the FCA to reconsider its approach to cryptocurrency regulation. According to the fund, developers of decentralized protocols, who do not act as custodians of user assets, cannot be equated to financial intermediaries.

The key argument of the DeFi Education Fund is that decentralized financial applications and protocols operate on the principle of 'unilateral responsibility'. This means that users themselves control their funds and are responsible for their transactions, rather than relying on a centralized operator.

Expert opinion

The position of the DeFi Education Fund is reasonable from the perspective of the specifics of decentralized finance. The key feature of DeFi protocols is the absence of an intermediary who could be responsible for user actions. Regulating such protocols as financial intermediaries could create significant barriers to the development of innovative solutions in the field of decentralized finance.

At the same time, it should be noted that some DeFi projects may still pose certain risks to users, for example, in terms of the security of smart contracts or the transparency of algorithms. Therefore, a reasonable compromise could be a regulation that takes into account the specifics of DeFi, but at the same time provides basic guarantees of user rights protection.

Share this article